Talk:Buckskins

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Indigenous peoples of North America Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States History

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Untitled

Both illustrations belong on the right hand side due to each subject's orientation. What I don't have is the technical skill to make that happen. The closest I've gotten is using tables - but even that result isn't entirely satisfactory. I'm quite puzzled over why I can get the images to float/stack to the right but not to the left. At any rate, I invite someone with better wiki skills to take a crack at it. I'll keep an eye on this article so I can learn. TIA. Rklawton 20:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take care of it, thanks for finding that picture. - PKM 03:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see the change, but I'm not sure it's an improvement - both photos are facing away from the article. My note above says "right," but I actually meant left. Any ideas about how to make that happen? Rklawton 05:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. You want them stacked one on top of the other on the left? Boy I wish I had a good way to do that. - PKM 18:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

De-stubbed

This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified.

By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubified.

If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 20:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]