Talk:Buachaille Etive Mòr
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Path?
[edit]"Alternatively there is a good path leading up the Coire na Tulaich" - it may have improved since I last came down the corrie, but it didn't seem much like the linked article: suggest remove link, make it clear it's steep and rough, or find another word. ...dave souza 20:40, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
largest buttress?
[edit]Is surely North Buttress. The ref to Crowberry is def worthwhile for historical value though. Maybe a small topo line drawing of main features if one could be linked online? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billo72 (talk • contribs) 12:32, 14 September 2006
Oops, my faulty memory. I've removed mention of the North Buttress for now because it has no context. Ideally there should be a full topographical description of the north face (there are other buttresses/ridges other than the two/three mentioned so far), mentioning important and classic climbs as appropriate; just mentioning North Buttress in passing looks out of place, I think. A diagram is an excellent idea though. --Blisco 19:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
This high res (7Mb) image of Stob Dearg shows the various ridges if anyone wants to have a go at incorporating it
In the news
[edit]This article was featured on Wikipedia's Main page "In the news" section 25 January 2008:
- Three people are killed and one is injured following an avalanche on Buachaille Etive Mòr (pictured) in the Scottish Highlands.
--Mais oui! (talk) 13:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Source is an Advert?
[edit]The use of this https://www.visualsofscotland.co.uk/elopement-photography-scotland as a source feels a bit like an advert; since it takes you to a photographer's website with prices and contact details. If not an advert, it certainly feels misplaced/awry. Should I remove it, or do you think it is best left? Many thanks EcheveriaJ (talk) 17:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Good call, I've removed it. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. . . dave souza, talk 18:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)