This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Comment: This article needs to be improved. It satisfies WP:ANYBIO through the prize category. Nevertheless, it is a prize given by an ex-president of a small South-East European country. This academic is notable through his Works and contributions to the Philosophy of Religion and the author of the article should outline these topics. As it looks so far, the article is poorly conceived and edited. No common reader would be attracted to read only a list of Works, without any interesting commentaries about them. To sum up, this academic deserves much more than a list of titles, an enumeration of no interest to the reader, except for a specialist. The article must be improved.--Clairec78 (talk) 11:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
