Talk:Bryan Charnley

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from the booklet Bryan Charnley: the Art of Schizophrenia by Kirsten Tambling, produced to accompany the exhibition of the same title held at Bethlem Museum of the Mind between February - May 2015. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2017091410025195.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Fair use rationale for Image:Bryan charnley 1.jpg

Image:Bryan charnley 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you check Image : Bryan charnley 1.jpg. I would like to add a description, as requested, but I can't find this file. Has there been a typo? The images on Wikipedia are Bryan Charnley Self Portrait 13, Clown in a Landscape and Jealousy. Thanks James Charnley James Charnley (talk) 15:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

James Charnley, if you follow the red link to Image:Bryan charnley 1.jpg, you will see that it was deleted at the request of the uploader on 14 February 2008. The self-portrait has been deleted on Commons. It can be undeleted if you are able to arrange for an acceptable statement of permission to be sent to OTRS (please include the same ticket number as was used for previous permissions, 2017091410025195, in the subject field). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:43, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JLAN, Thanks for clarification on the link to Bryan Charnley 1.JPG. I do not want to use this image so it is ok to leave deleted. Thanks James Charnley James Charnley (talk) 19:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

A selection of Bryan's paintings are currently on display in the Bethlem Museum's temporary exhibition room on the first floor. The exhibition, titled The Art of Schizophrenia, will run until 22 May. SENIRAM (talk) 12:34, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem resolved

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20130602045927/https://www.bryancharnley.info. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to www.bryancharnley.info/Contacts you will see that the copyright permission to use information from this site has been extended to Wikipedia. Thus: "Copyright 2017 Bryan Charnley - Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0". This will solve the issue with copyright on Bryan Charnley's Wikipedia entry. I would also like to add that I am deeply upset by this whole affair. Kirsten Tambling spent a lot of time putting her information on Wikipedia. She used information from her own research with additional material from me. There has been any copyright infringement as it affects The Estate of Bryan Charnley. Please replace the redacted text as soon a possible. Thank you. James Charnley James Charnley (talk) 19:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided Wikipedia copyright permission under a compatible in order that the text removed from Bryan Charnley's entry by JLAN is replaced. Please check www.bryancharnley.info and Wikipedia permissions. The text mainly by Kirsten Tambling removed 11 November was an accurate and scholarly source of reference and needs to be back in the public domain.James Charnley James Charnley (talk) 08:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: We have received a permission for the text used in this article. Can you please add the corresponding template, referring to ticket: 2017091410025195? Thank you --Ruthven (msg) 14:21, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done, Ruthven, and thank you for handling that ticket. That takes care of text by Kirsten Tambling (where I anyway did not notice any apparent copyvio, perhaps because I don't have that booklet). The problem of the previous text copied from www.bryancharnley.info has now been resolved by the addition of a CC-BY SA 3.0 licence to those pages, so I'm going to ask TonyBallioni if he would kindly un-hide the revisions he very kindly hid before. Diannaa, is it possible that text in the two revisions that you hid was in fact also sourced to https://www.bryancharnley.info, which is now compatibly licenced?

I'm sorry for any anxiety or displeasure my removal of the earlier text here may have caused to James Charnley or to Ktamb – our copyright policy is quite strict, and is of course designed for the protection of copyright owners as well as Wikipedia itself. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:19, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The prose does appear at that web page, so I have re-added it, along with the required attribution and licensing. Thanks to everybody who helped quickly resolve this issue. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ruthven as an OTRS agent, I see nothing in that ticket that would affect my revdel or the text copyright status. If Diannaa has verified the licensing on the website itself, that is fine, but this is not an OTRS permission. Update: nevermind, I see what you are referencing. Sorry for the confusion. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of text from this page

Hi, I'm not sure why all my edits to this page made back in 2016 have been removed? It seems that there has been some issue with copyright violation over an image, but all of my written material was good quality, useful information referencing sources that are not freely available on the internet (i.e., not just the bryancharnley.info website). I don't want to spend hours re-adding lots of text if it's just going to be removed (and surely it exists in the back-end somewhere anyway? Kytamb (talk) 07:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reinstating text by Kirsten Tambling on Bryan Charnley Wikipedia entry.

 I have allowed images and text to be used from wwww. Bryancharnley.info under Creative Commons BY - SA 3.0. so that the images that appear on Bryan Charnley Wikipedia are all legal and clear of any copyright infringements. I have done this so that the administrator JLAN is satisfied that no procedural protocols have been breached. My only request, on behalf of Kirsten Tambling, is that her text is reinstated. If JLAN could just do this then the knowledge base that Wikipedia promotes will be enhanced and the many people who request information on this artist can be informed. Thank You in advance. James Charnley. James Charnley (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC) James Charnley (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Previous entry in discussion

Has the post I put regrading reinstatement of Kirsten Tambling's text on Bryan Charnley's Wikipedia entry been read? I am a little confused as to how the discussion works and how it is possible to establish a dialogue between administrator and contributor. My endeavour is to restore the Wikipedia page that has been taken down. Please let me know what I must I do to facilitate this. James CharnleyJames Charnley (talk) 18:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC) James Charnley (talk) 18:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]