Talk:Brussels S Train

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Low-importance).

This article relates to Brussels, and should follow the Brussels naming conventions.

2009 Plan

I had originally included the 2009 Plan, but after some research, it seems that this 7-line network is no longer the proposal. The 9-line system is what newspapers cite, as well as the SNCB themselves. I propose the re-deletion of this section. ConorBrady ^.ie (caint) 08:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, really? I didn't realise that. We should also remove it from the article on the French wikipedia in that case. Do you have references somewhere which accurately describe the current status? This image from this page, suggests that in fact there will be eight lines. --David Edgar (talk) 11:57, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After doing a lot of searching both in French and in English, I haven't found anything definitive that says that the 2009 Plan was dropped. Having said that though, the only place I have found mention it was indeed on the French Wiki page.

As far as the number of lines is concerned, yes that map states that there will be eight. Counting the different coloured lines on the map, however, indicates nine. ConorBrady ^.ie (caint) 18:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So this site, particularly the final report it links, seems interesting. I presume that this is what has been reported as the 2009 plan.

I haven't had a chance to read through it all, but I note that it's focusing on the longer term, with its maps looking at 2015 onwards. Whereas maps like this one on the SNCB site are described as "Horizon 2012". So does this mean they could actually both be valid? Or is the 2009 report merely a study, and has never been officially accepted as a future strategy?

So perhaps it's most sensible to keep the main route description as that currently described by SNCB/NMBS, and add a paragraph or two referencing the 2009 plan / study / report as a future proposal, and identifying its key points? --David Edgar (talk) 13:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the section, somewhat, to basically cover these points. More could still be added. --David Edgar (talk) 14:19, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, David. ConorBrady ^.ie (caint) 16:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/brusselsrer/
Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/brusselsrer/specs.html
Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 11:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 22:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brussels Regional Express Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101122224925/http://www.beliris.be:80/vert/journal_RER.pdf to http://www.beliris.be/vert/journal_RER.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://levif.rnews.be/fr/news/actualite/belgique/rer-le-train-qui-a-vingt-ans-de-retard/article-1194675724333.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.infrabel.be/portal/page/portal/pgr_inf2_e_internet/mobility_project/rer

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated sources should be added

What does it mean by “Operation will start in 2015”.It's already 2018 now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon YifanLing SFLS Shanghai (talk • contribs) 10:25, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]