Talk:Brunswick Line

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	July 1, 2009

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

Maryland Mid‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: West Virginia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Mid-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Brunswick Line.

Rolling stock

I'm pretty sure 874/877 uses more than six cars. —Wrathchild ^(talk) 15:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Top Importance?

What is the rationalisation for this project being so important? 86.24.193.136 (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not, I changed it to mid importance. Thanks, C628 (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Refactor and userfy

I'm a railfan, and found the Rolling Stock section confusing. It needs userfied to explain some of the differences the Trains buff author apparently is knowledge everyone knows. TEACH, don't document and call it writing.

Similarly, does that section belong so high in the article. Again, least interesting to the general reader stumbling onto the page. Should be down one section more, if not two. Rolling stock only matters to the kind of railfan known as rivet counters. Even most railfans agree that is extreme! (No doubt make good 3D V-scale content creators if they don't overdue the polys!) // FrankB 21:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brunswick Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090423150353/http://www.mtamaryland.com:80/about/transitprofiles/MARC_History.cfm to http://mtamaryland.com/about/transitprofiles/MARC_History.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]