Talk:Brunel University lecture centre/GA1

GA Review

Unsuccessful. asilvering (talk) 03:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Suntooooth (talk · contribs) 21:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: asilvering (talk · contribs) 03:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be quickfailing this article for now, for being a long way from meeeting the GA criteria, particularly #3, broad in coverage. The coverage is so lacking here that the references don't show a WP:GNG pass for the article. The Guardian coverage is two sentences. Londonist has barely a paragraph. There's some coverage in Topping, but not the 15 pages implied by the citation. Imani and Imani is a paragraph (and doesn't look like a reliable source, either). There are no citations in the article contemporary to the building's construction.

Finding more sources with significant coverage will help you expand the article so that it means criterion 3. In particular I suggest that you look for information on the construction of the building, which is presently absent from the article, and anything you can find about the use of the building (other than for filming) between when it was built and when it was listed.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.