Talk:Brule Lake (Minnesota)

A fact from Brule Lake (Minnesota) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 June 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Brule Lake in Minnesota is the source of two rivers that enter Lake Superior forty miles apart?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brule Lake (Minnesota).

Wikipedia

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lakes

	Lakes portal Brule Lake (Minnesota) is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

No map?

I canoed in Brule Lake many years ago. Surprised to see this entry but suggest it would be much better with a map showing Brule and nearby lakes. Sca (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with expression

Congrats on DYK! It needs some editting.

Out of each end flow the Temperance River and the South Brule, a tributary of the Brule River. Brule Lake was logged heavily in the early 1900s, and the region around it was....

The rivers don't both flow out of "each end", surely? They either both flow in one end out the other, or else they flow out of opposite ends.
Brule Lake wasn't logged. Not unless it was a very unusual lake. It was the area, region or valley or shore that was logged, but not Brule Lake.

Can you do a careful scrutiny for other such errors of expression?

Amandajm (talk) 15:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to do so, but style has never been my forte. Norstrem (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brule Lake (Minnesota). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100620195347/http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=a85d27fccd7bb5196096dbde7a2af2e8&rgn=div5&view=text&node=36:2.0.1.1.26&idno=36 to http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=b4d5db84b0df8b0f191ad63b4be2537b&rgn=div5&view=text&node=36:2.0.1.1.26&idno=36

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]