Talk:Bruce Nelson (historian)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Dartmouth Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire - Dartmouth College (assessed as Low-importance).

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hey, I am not sure how to edit the main page, but Bruce Nelson died in July 2022 according to LAWCHA https://www.lawcha.org/2022/07/16/in-memoriam-2/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14D:4700:D890:2078:50DB:5EA5:A564 (talk) 04:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet Speedy Deletion rules

This article does not meet any of the 12 criteria for speedy deletion (patent nonsense and gibberish; test pages; pure vandalism; recreation of deleted material; banned user; housekeeping; author-requested deletion; talk page with no corresponding article; office action; attack page; or blatant advertising; or blatant copyright infringement).

Furthermore, the article clearly asserts why Nelson is notable (see the second sentence of the article: "noted labor historian"). The article goes on to document why he is notable: acclaimed labor historian, inline citations to peer-reviewed articles about his work claiming they are the "best analysis" and a "landmark study" and "unique", won major writing and research prizes from academic associations, that he has been honored by the U.S. government and private institutions with research fellowships, and that he has won teaching awards from his university. I fail to see how this is not notable (or did anyone care to read the article?).

Additionally, the article doesn't even meet the Deletion policy guidelines. It contains no violation of copyright, its content belongs in an encyclopedia (e.g., the article is not a dictionary entry; does not contain original thought or research; is not written as an advertisement; does not engage in soapbox-ing by pushing a point of view; is not a mirror site; is not merely a repository of links, images, or media files; does not engage in blogging social networking or memorializing; contains nothing which might make it a directory page; is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook; does not make predictions; and is not an an indiscriminate collection of information), its content is verifiable and comes from reliable sources, and it contains no unreferenced negative content.

This article should not be deleted. - Tim1965 20:21, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability requires objective evidence. My understanding is that if you had a reference backing up the assertion that he is a notable labor historian somebody may remove the tag. Simply stating that he is a notable historian isn't sufficient though. If you provide objective evidence, my concerns would vanish. Spa toss 21:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Substantial coverage in reliable sources constitutes such objective evidence, as do published peer recognition..." If you'd read the article, you'd have seen that reliable sources were used as inline citations to his notability in the body of the article, and that he was published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals. - Tim1965 01:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the awards and fellowships listed more than prove his notability. Certainly those are "objective evidence" of his significance as an historian. Besides, if notability was your concern, why not apply a {{notability}} tag instead? -- Scartol 21:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More than one way to skin a cat. I was just about to recommend that Scartol, who was not the original creator of the article, to remove the speedy delete tag if s/he thought the subject sufficiently notable, but somebody else beat scartol to it. Thanks for your attention. Spa toss 21:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bruce Nelson (historian). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070102172421/http://www.oah.org:80/activities/awards/turner/index.html to http://www.oah.org/activities/awards/turner/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]