Talk:Bruce Bagemihl
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bruce Bagemihl article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ricky Gervais
[edit]ricky gervais did a stand up piece on this book.
- So what? I think that this is WP:UNDUE and should be removed. I can understand why the fact that Biological Exuberance was cited in Lawrence vs. Texas is here; this is certainly significant information. One attack on the book or parody by a comedian doesn't seem significant or worth including. Devil Goddess (talk) 20:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- What about all the "In popular culture" sections?! Should we remove all those references from all articles too then? I agree with the OP here; a reference should be added for the RG stand-up. If the issue here is that it was an "attack" then the statement can simply say it was parodied or mentioned or whatever.
- Please read Wikipedia:"In popular culture" content. All references in popular culture are not necessarily suitable for across the board inclusion in Wikipedia; rather, we have criteria in place to distinguish references that are noteworthy and warrant inclusion from ones that are just random trivia. I don't know enough about the Ricky Gervais routine to know which side of the line it falls on, but it's not automatically appropriate for inclusion just because it existed — it has to be noteworthy in some way beyond simply having happened. Bearcat (talk) 14:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- What about all the "In popular culture" sections?! Should we remove all those references from all articles too then? I agree with the OP here; a reference should be added for the RG stand-up. If the issue here is that it was an "attack" then the statement can simply say it was parodied or mentioned or whatever.
Controversy
[edit]The article says nothing about why this book is controversial, so I removed that statement. If someone wants to talk about how it's controversial, then it can be put back in.96.21.160.108 (talk) 12:31, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Retracted
[edit]See http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/magazine/04animals-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:34, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
While the book, “Biological Exuberance,” by Bruce Bagemihl, was cited in a brief filed for the case, it was not cited in the decision itself.
— Jon Mooallem, Can Animals Be Gay?, New York Times Magazine, 31 March 2010
Quoted by Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:37, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Unknown-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles