Talk:Brownsea Castle/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 15:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, changes made as per below. Cheers! Hchc2009 (talk) 16:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- One DAB, external links good.
- Still have DAB to greenhouse.
- Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Images appropriately licensed.
- it was in a very poor condition This maybe a Britishism, but "a" very poor condition reads oddly to me.
- I think it is BritEng thing - I've done a quick Google, and it's not just me! ;)
- 4 feet (1.2 m) high Remember how to format the template for the adjectival form from my last review of yours?
- Adj=on should now be applied. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- It's a little more complicated than that. Use {{convert|4|ft|m|adj=mid|-long|1}} as a model, substituting high for long, etc., as needed. I did one of them already to make sure that it works. Don't forget to delete the extra adjective that will follow from your original phrasing.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Done. I don't think "across" needs it... Hchc2009 (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Adj=on should now be applied. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- the ferrying rits in 1581 typo, I think.
- Yup, fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- What's the connection between Charles Sturt and the Napoleonic Wars?
- I've clarified a bit more, but the source was unclear about what he was actually doing in it. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Is it Jacobethean or Jacobean? I've seen the latter, but never the former.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- It should be Jacobethan (I can't see Jacobethean) - the wikilink gives some more background on it. It refers to a mock form of Jacobean. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I guess that I should have pursued the link a bit more diligently.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)