Talk:Brough Castle

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brough Castle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Brough Castle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 2, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Lancashire and Cumbria High‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Classical / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Expansion...

I've gone through and given the article a bit of a scrub, added a floor plan etc. Probably introduced a few typos as well in the process... Hchc2009 (talk) 15:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Brough Castle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 23:50, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

The castle was finally restored in the late 17th century Um, it wasn't finally restored, and it wasn't the late 17th century. Re-phrase.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

three disambig links:
- Cobble
- River Eden
- Wark Castle

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

Where you have a URL, no need an accessdate

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
All pictures have appropriate rationales

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Hopefully all done now - thanks for the review! Hchc2009 (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]