Talk:Brothers Cider
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-12-08. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Untitled
[edit]Does anyone have a higher quality image of the Brothers Bar that can be used here? --Mercifull (BattlestarWiki) 10:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
I found this article here. Might be worth incorporating some information here into the Histroy section? --Mercifull 14:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
This article is nothing more than an advert for a poor product made by a company famous for mediocrity which is afraid of using its own name. As such, should it be in Wikipedia at all. I think it should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.82.251.227 (talk • contribs)
- As someone who has been repeatedly warned for vandalism your POV comments thankfully mean nothing to the general concensus which was to keep this article. Also seems odd for a company that is "afraid of using its own name" to be such a large sponsor of music festivals and put billboard ads up around the country. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 15:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
[edit]This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Neutrality
[edit]I've tagged the article for neutrality. A good proportion of it has been written by two contributors who have no other articles. The whole article reads a bit like an advert or press release. Talskiddy (talk) 16:46, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- I've toned down some of the promotional language. If there is anything else you think is to much like an advert just change it or comment here.— Rod talk 20:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
There is a bit of bias, but I am not sure I can find appropriate citations. I've found the company name and address on the label of a supermarket brand of cheap cider, the sort sold in 2-litre plastic bottles. This page, and the company website, don't mention that side of the business at all. The particular brand was "Compton Orchard", a sort of naming which is getting quite common in UK supermarkets for what used to be clearly own-brand. There's clearly more to what the business produces than is listed here., and the company is rather reticent about it. But finding available citations, that's hard. I only found it from the small print on the bottle label. 87.115.163.142 (talk) 07:24, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brothers Cider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120814004551/http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/Drinks-Brands-News/Pear-perception to http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/Drinks-Brands-News/Pear-perception
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)