Talk:Brother XII

Occult Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Canada: British Columbia / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also Canadian Theosophist?

I'm not trying to be nationalist about this, but since his escapades occurred in Canada and he would have to be the most famous Theosophist ever to be around these parts (other than Yeats or Blavatsky through on the Grand Tour). His "nationality" at the time is irrelevant, somewhat, because in those days a Briton had full rights, as a British subject, within Canada and did not need to be nationalized to Canadian citizenship; he was as Canadian as anyone else here, essentially, like the many Scots and English neighbours we had in the places I'm from who may or may not have naturalized to Canadian; many didn't and it didn't matter. Anyway, the point is that maybe he should be in Category:Canadian Theosophists as well?Skookum1 (talk) 04:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only if he became a Canadian citizen. As you say, he was a British citizen, not a Canadian one. He had the right to reside in Canada, not to call himself Canadian. He was English. Yworo (talk) 02:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Becoming a "Canadian citiizen" was something quite different before the passage of the Citizenship Act in 1947. He would have had the right to call himself that. Eclecticology (talk) 19:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question

The article mentions something about him being the reincarnation of Osiris, were those his words (and if so, can we get an exact quotation from a reliable source?), or is that a typo, as I'm not sure someone who was never incarnate (Osiris) can be reincarnated. My final suggestion may be to replace "reincarnation" in the article with "incarnation." panth0r (talk) 03:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

His wife/mistress definitely appears in print and their own works as the Reincarnation of Isis, I don't recall teh specifics of his own self-styling as he preferred "Brother XII" and something else - "the Master" perhaps...and I beg to differ on Osiris - he was after all a body at some point, or else Isis would never have had to sew his hacked-together pieces back together again; "he was never incarnate" doesn't jibe with my conception of the Egyptian notion of gods either; they were not immanent or immaterial, they were reality, not an abstraction or disembodied; the whole point of the immortality of the body was because of that; if "being spiritual" meant not placing a value on mateiral existence, or emulating Osiris' own immortalization=after-death by his wife, then mummification would have been irrelevant, likewise the lavish grave goods and tombs. Not sure what hte Book of Thoth or the Book of the Dead have to say about this, but I think you're quite wrong about osiris "never being incarnate".Skookum1 (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Can we get a photo of him? https://brotherxii.com/images/XII.jpg This is him in his 40s 151.200.243.67 (talk) 18:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]