Talk:Broomfield, Colorado

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: Colorado / U.S. counties Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

It would be interesting to know why this tiny urban county was created in 2001. --Jfruh 21:37, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Before 2001, Broomfield existed in four separate counties: Boulder, Adams, Jefferson, and Weld. The decision to begin the push to become the 64th county of colorado was started in part to defray the problems with having to deal with four separate court districts, four different county seats (each an average of almost an hour away from Broomfield), and four separate county sales tax bases. Broomfield decided that it could provide county services better and more responsively if it were its own county rather than dealing with four separate counties. ^neoEinstein 08:19, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please ensure that elections material posted on this page deals with the election in an objective manner. Please stay away from highly controversial topics that may only incite a flame war (trolling).

There is already enough trolling being done in the local media outlets for the entire campaign. It needn't be brought to this informational source.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Neoeinstein (talk • contribs) 08:19, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The link to sister city Broomfield, UK directs only to the Broomfield disambiguation page, on which three Broomfields are listed in the UK. Could someone familiar with the sister city program fix this to link to the correct city's page?Az7997 15:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

poverty

why no poverty statistic? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.179.209 (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Broomfield, Colorado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Broomfield, Colorado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dola.state.co.us/dlg/local_governments/municipalities.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927043853/http://www.ci.broomfield.co.us/community.shtml to http://www.ci.broomfield.co.us/community.shtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.broomfield.org/election/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.broomfield.org/religion/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Origins of Broomfield name

I understand there's a sketchy article claiming to know the source of the Broomfield name, but it's not citing where it got its information from, suggesting it's just a guess. It seems unlikely that this town, which shares its name with an actual surname and an actual place in England, wouldn't take those into consideration when the name was selected. It's a bit of a stretch to get from "broomcorn" to "Broomfield". I'm suggesting that the linked source and the name explanation itself be removed until something more credible comes along (like the actual meeting minutes where this was discussed or contemporary news stories that reported on the change). [EDIT: There's no mention of "broomcorns" on the City's history site. There's mention of grain as a crop. (https://www.broomfield.org/386/History-of-Broomfield) There are other sites that cover this information, which I would recommend using instead of the linked article. (https://coloradoencyclopedia.org/article/city-and-county-broomfield) Also, I don't see support for a name change per se, as mentioned in the current version. There was an area called Zang’s Spur, but that wasn't the name of an actual city.] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.153.74.111 (talk) 01:07, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flag isn't official but used throughout the city

After a back-and-forth discussion with a representative from the City and County of Broomfield, it was discovered that the Broomfield flag (the flag that currently flies over official Broomfield buildings, no less) was never officially adopted. In my last communication with the City, they informed me that they will start working adopting an official flag. I previously added the flag to the article believing it to be official. Now that City has discovered they do not have an official flag, I'd like to get input from others. Do we leave the flag in the article or remove it. I'm on the fence, since the flag does literally physically exist and is in use throughout the city. What's your thoughts? — fcsuper^{(How's That?, That's How!)} _{(Exclusionistic Immediatist )}— 01:36, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Fire of 2022

Why is this not mentioned at all? 2600:6C67:1100:1643:48E6:7250:690B:A400 (talk) 03:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Housing

is there an active adult community in Broomfield..one where you have to be at least 50 to live there? 2600:8800:3986:FE00:6F03:85D6:670F:27 (talk) 02:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]