Jump to content

Talk:Brooks Brown

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Google "Knowledge Graph" troubles

[edit]

Just tonight I Googled Brooks Brown. Google showed me their so-called Knowledge Graph on the right side of the screen. This consisted of (basically) five parts:

1. A capsule biography of the Oregon saxophonist, formerly a member of the band Cherry Poppin' Daddies. This was attributed to Wikipedia.

2. A year of birth, namely 1980. This seems thoroughly implausible for the saxophonist, since he joined Cherry Poppin' Daddies in 1989 and therefore would have been nine (9) years old. I imagine this is intended as the date of birth of the Columbine High School survivor who wrote a book about the Columbine massacre of 1999, although it seems to be off by one year -- the Columbine Brooks Brown appears to have been born in 1981.

3. An entry "Education: Columbine High School (1999)," which is a clear reference to the author of "No Easy Answers: the Truth Behind Death at Columbine."

4. An entry "Books: No Easy Answers: the Truth Behind Death at Columbine."

5. An entry "Music Group: Cherry Poppin' Daddies (1989-1994)".

I know of three people named Brooks Brown:

A. The Oregon saxophonist, who I believe was born in the 1960s; Yes, I was born in 1961.--Brooksrichardbrown (talk) 00:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC) B. The Columbine High School guy, author of the book about the Columbine massacre, born in 1980 or 1981; C. A major-league baseball pitcher for the Colorado Rockies,born in 1984 or 1985.[reply]

Conclusions:

    • "A" and "C" both have Wikipedia articles, while "B" does not, although he is arguably notable as an author. Both articles are short; the article about the saxophonist ("A") does not even include his date of birth.
    • The Google "Knowledge Graph" is an incoherent pastiche of "A" and "B". In a way, this "Graph" is attributed to Wikipedia, which is an insult to Wikipedia. To whom can we complain about this?
    • Google's "Knowledge Graph feature is so lame as to be useless.

Comments from the subject

[edit]

Sorry, I don't have online references for most of these, and I realize I have a conflict of interest. My hope is that this information adds accuracy and completeness. Brooksrichardbrown (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]