Talk:Brookfield, Connecticut

Brookfield Library was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 May 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Brookfield, Connecticut. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Connecticut High‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

History of Brookfield, Connecticut is not a notable article. This article is about Brookfield; there's no reason to have three small sections in another article. Just merge them. Timneu22 00:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created the separate article because the history section was already too long, and then I added so much to the history article that it's about as long as the Brookfield article. Please see Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles, where it is stated:

In shorter articles, if one subtopic has much more text than another subtopic, that may be an indication that that subtopic should have its own page, with only a summary presented on the main page.

And where it is also stated:

Wikipedia entries tend to grow in a way which lends itself to the natural creation of new entries. The text of any entry consists of a sequence of related but distinct subtopics. When there is enough text in a given subtopic to merit its own entry, that text can be excised from the present entry and replaced by a link. Some characteristics:

Longer articles are split into sections (each about several good-sized paragraphs long. Subsectioning can increase this amount)
Ideally many of those sections will eventually provide summaries of separate articles on the sub-topic covered in that section (a Main article or similar link would be below the section title—see Template:Main)

So the creation of the history article follows style guidelines.

The town history is also the subject of more than one book, and, it can be assumed, other types of coverage, making it notable under WP:N. Noroton 02:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cities assessor

Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(^{Dime algo}_{or see my works}) 21:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

brookfield...

the forgotten town of fairfield county.

i think its safe to say that brookfield is probably the most forgotten town in the county, this is kind of unrelated to the article but I was just wondering if anyone else agrees with me too. Im not saying that its not part of fairfield county, im just wondering if anyone else thinks that people really overlook it too much and forget that its even their. Kotosb (talk) 20:22, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that title goes to Sherman, Connecticut. They're the only town in the county without a 203 area code.--AirportExpert (talk) 20:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)AirportExpert.[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brookfield, Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]