Talk:Bromophenol blue

Chemicals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

If anyone needs it, the SMILES formula is Oc1c(Br)cc(cc1Br)C2(OS(=O)(=O)c3ccccc23)c4cc(Br)c(O)c(Br)c4 —71.41.210.146 04:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chembox was added including the smiles formula

-- Panoramix303 (talk) 18:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

color marker

there is a slight ambiguity in the protein part; the net charge on proteins varys quite a bit - some are neg, some are positive. the std practice is to add SDS; this coats most proteins and adds a lot of neg charge. by the way, i no longer contribute to wiki because a for profit person or entity can sell my work; i don't mind if non profit people copy it with attribution; but someone making money off of my back is simply wrong, and I don't understand why other wikians are not up in revolt on this issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.236.121.54 (talk) 12:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]