Talk:Brodmann area 44
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brodmann area 44. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070326190429/http://braininfo.rprc.washington.edu:80/Scripts/ancilcentraldirectory.aspx?ID=52 to http://braininfo.rprc.washington.edu/Scripts/ancilcentraldirectory.aspx?ID=52
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 7 December 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to any particular title at this time, per the discussion below. Whether this should be merged to a different article is a separate question and discussion on that topic can continue as necessary. Dekimasuよ! 18:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Brodmann area 44 → Opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus – Proper name for that part of the surface anatomy of the brain; use of Brodmann area adds a confusing mix of cytoarchitecture; in line with Orbital part of inferior frontal gyrus and other descriptive anatomic terms such as Angular gyrus is used and a separate entry for Brodmann area 39 is also used; same for primary motor cortex and separate page for Brodmann area 4; again Supramarginal gyrus and separate page BA 40, and so on. These are informative terms to a reader, unlike sole use of BA numbers; any neuroanatomy book shows descriptive terms on brain diagrams unless specifiying cytoarchitecture. Iztwoz (talk) 22:39, 7 December 2018 (UTC) --Relisted. Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 11:54, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Relist note. Members of WikiProjects Anatomy and Neuroscience have been notified of this discussion. Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 12:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- I agree that the pages should be merged. I have no opinion on whether "Opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus" or "Brodmann area 44" should be the title of the resulting page. I recommend that the other pairs be merged as well. The separate pages imply that these are separate structures, which can be confusing. --Iamozy (talk) 22:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- The suggestion was to rename the page not to merge. And since areas 41 and 42 have their own single page entry suggest Brodmann areas 44 and 45 have their own single page. --Iztwoz (talk) 23:29, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to a subsection of Broca's area. The needless and confusing subdivision into articles about Broca's areas only confuses things. Moving to a macroscopically defined structure as per Iztwoz would be supported if this doesn't have consensus--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.