Jump to content

Talk:British Tabulating Machine Company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

the need for an all-British machine was spurred by a government policy that favoured procurement of US-made equipment

[edit]

How could a British government policy favoring procurement of US-made equipment spur the need for an all-British machine? Or was it a US government policy? If a US policy, why would a British firm care? A British policy favoring procurement of British machines would spur the need for an all-British machine but that is not what the article says. tooold 16:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the paragrpah here pending clarification:
In 1937 BTM started the development of its own ambitious machine, the Rolling-Total Tabulator. BTM had gradually developed its engineering expertise by developing modifications to the American equipment (necessitated in part by the need to handle Britain's non-decimal currency), andthe need for an all-British machine was spurred by a government policy that favoured procurement of US-made equipment, and by the need to reduce royalty payments.
— Matt Crypto 16:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Tabulating Machine Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Tabulating Machine Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]