This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
It is indeed listed on its own website. I think the best thing would be to find some third party source(s) to help bolster the school’s notability. Any press release or government document (in English or Portuguese) would go a long way at this point. giso6150 (talk) 18:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Soooo, The British School of Brasilia is notable because its owner/operator has an article. The foundation is notable because it owns/operates a number of schools, some of which have articles. The school is unsourced and WP:CRYSTAL. The foundation musters just one impartial source. This whole cluster of articles hovers very close to the base line for notability.
Both articles were created by editors who seem to have a WP:COI and come very close to WP:ADVERT.
Kvng At the time I wrote that, I'd have deleted the two articles as advertising (for the foundation) and advertising & WP:CRYSTAL for the school, without prejudice to their recreation should more detail become available once the school has actually started operating. Perhaps creating a category to tie together the notable schools in the foundation's portfolio.
Unfortunately, in looking at the foundation's other schools, it appears that they're pretty much cookie-cutter versions of each other created by a string of single-purpose accounts with more than a vague whiff of sockpuppetry. I'm now veering towards deletion of all the foundation's school articles through a single AfD, and an WP:SPI as the only way to clear up. Have you looked at the others? Bazj (talk) 21:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]