Talk:British Red Cross

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

The use of the British Red Cross symbol is protected by law and it is questionable whether this is an appropriate use. You must request its use from the International Commitee, or at least the International Federation. It is important that any information on this page is input at least by a volunteer of the British Red Cross.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Go rators (talk • contribs) 11:59, 17 May 2006

You ar eabsoulutely cirrect in need rep[est copyright images and the need to consider fair use. However as to whom may add info about any given topic, as Wikipedia states on its main page: "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit". So no, anyone can (and will) add info if it collaboratively and constructively helps improve this article about a great organisation. David Ruben ^Talk 17:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact this page is incorrectly using the Red Cross Emblem. In this context, the rules surrounding use of the emblem state that the cross must not be displayed on its own, and should always be accompanied by the national Society's name. I have removed the emblem until we can upload the 'correct' version. DAllardyce 10:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that an educational use of the emblem in the context of providing information about the Red Cross movement in general, or parts of the movement like the British Red Cross society in particular, is perfectly okay. By using the symbol to illustrate an article, Wikipedia does not attach itself inappropriately in any way with the Red Cross movement and Wikipedia does not use the symbol for commercial gain, both which would amount to a misuse of the indicative aspect of the symbol. Neither is such use in any way related to inappropriate application for protecting Wikipedia from being targetted by military attacks, which would constitute a misuse of the protective aspect of the symbol. --Uwe 16:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"In fact this page is incorrectly using the Red Cross Emblem. In this context, the rules surrounding use of the emblem state that the cross must not be displayed on its own, and should always be accompanied by the national Society's name" - except by the MoD of course. --jmb 12:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Food Parcels

The British Red Cross sent "over 20 million food parcels" to POWs

I have seen photos of the parcels being prepared in Britain, but how were the parcels, and letters to/from POWs, transferred from Britain to/from Germany in the middle of the war?

I thought that any shipping entering/leaving Britain was liable to attack, so was there a specific agreement for movement of each Red Cross boat, and how was this arranged?

Don't know where else to ask the question Arjayay (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe cooperation with Germany was involved.--Wahmae (talk) 14:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skin camouflage

Removed the reference to Skin Camouflage under 'Health & social care' as this service was discontinued in 2011. Britishredcross (talk) 14:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on British Red Cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090420062003/http://www.willaid.org.uk:80/charities to http://www.willaid.org.uk/charities

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New structure

The BRC underwent a restructure during 2016, and local areas are not what they used to be. Instead, the different services have a national management structure. I can't find any decent publicly accessible source for this, but if anyone else can, it's worth updating cannywizard (talk) 12:21, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on British Red Cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]