Talk:British Railways ships

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of British Rail was copied or moved into British Railways ships with this edit on 29 March 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Chartres and Saint Germain

Emeraude - whilst Chartres and Saint Germain were French flagged, they were both operated by Sealink and allocated British Railways Class 99 numbers. For these reasons, they should be covered here. Mjroots (talk) 06:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then the article should specify that they were never owned or operated by British Rail..... Or, that the article is about all ships that had Sealink painted on the side, regardless of who owned and operated them. Emeraude (talk) 09:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First line of article is "British Rail operated" not "owned" so these two definitely belong. Agree that the text could mention they were not owned by BR- together with a source Lyndaship (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]