Talk:British Rail Class 57

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

i've seen virgin thunderbirds arround manchester a lot lately

Both pulling trains (ususally without another loco suggesting they aren't doing rescue work) and running light. Is this something to do with engineering works or are virgin having reliability problems? Plugwash 13:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i don't know but you'd be better off asking in a web forum, not here! — Dunc|☺ 10:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are currently working Arriva Trains Wales services on the North Wales Coast Line with due to a shortage of units. Our Phellap 12:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I think that the articles on the sub-classes should all be merged into the main Class 57 article. This is becuase the sub-class articles mainly duplicate information in the main article. It would be far better to have all the information contained within one article. An example of where this works effectivley is the British Rail Class 47 article. --Jorvik 11:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - more in line with other articles. Simply south 12:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have completed merger following no objections. --Jorvik 18:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should this now be merged with the class 47 article, after all they are historically the same locomotives, rather than a class apart? (SouthernElectric 14:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Possible change to the title of this article

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Rail Class 57. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130730165030/http://www.porterbrook.com/pages/corp2011.html to http://www.porterbrook.com/pages/corp2011.html#october11
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.rharchive.info/Issue281.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130427003019/http://www.porterbrook.co.uk:80/pages/corp2013.html to http://www.porterbrook.co.uk/pages/corp2013.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Current operators

Could the section about direct rail services be updated please a virgin trains no longer exist. Maurice Oly (talk) 23:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

57305 paint change

This has been raised a few times as an edit, however the editor has neglected to add a reliable source. Is there a reliable source which can be used to confirm this? Danners430 (talk) 21:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

57308 - Jamie Ferguson - altered coupling?

I notice that this locomotive has an coupling system at the front (folded up) as well as a traditional chain and hook affair…

Is this a recent addition to all 57’s? 92.40.196.77 (talk) 09:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was added during Virgin Trains’ tenure on the WCML - it’s a Scharfenberg coupler, used to allow the 57s to couple to Pendolinos in an emergency, or when on non-electrified lines. Danners430 (talk) 17:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These are Thunderbird locos. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

57009

57009 now in two-tone green, & may now be owned by WCRC. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3357780811105648&set=pcb.1459313544860545 . David Biddulph (talk) 10:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]