Talk:British Rail Class 465

Trains: in UK / Passenger trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 465. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems OK Dr Sludge (talk) 14:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in British Rail Class 465

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of British Rail Class 465's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "TRC1":

From British Rail Class 370: "Class 370 (Advanced Passenger Train)". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 21 August 2008. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
From British Rail Class 442: "Class 442". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 311: "Class 311". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 7 September 2008. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 502: "Class 502". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 3 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 504: "Class 504". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 20 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 303: "Class 303". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 25 July 2008. Retrieved 2 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 319: "Class 319". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 3 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 323: "Class 323". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
From British Rail Class 414: "Class 414". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 25 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 489: "Class 488, 489". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 21 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 401: "Class 401". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 25 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 312: "Class 312". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 25 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 304: "Class 304". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 15 June 2011. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
From British Rail Class 308: "Class 308". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 21 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 306: "Class 306". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 15 June 2011.
From British Rail Class 390: "Class 390 'Pendolino'". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 2 March 2016.
From British Rail Class 309: "Class 309". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 508: "Class 508". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 24 July 2008. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
From British Rail Class 307: "Class 307". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 24 July 2008. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 501: "Class 501". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 3 February 2016.
From British Rail Class 423: "Class 423". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 23 February 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet details table

For thouse good with editing tables could you please add a few rows called “stored” to the Production and numbering table under fleet details for the following subclasses

Class 465/0 Class 465/2 Class 465/9

As the following units have been sent to storage: 465017 465019 465236 465245 465246 465913 465927

Source for all of this is "Class 465 & 466 'Networker' units put into storage". Rail Express. No. August 2021. p. 30.

Thanks. Maurice Oly (talk) 15:57, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, because it's nothing to do with production. It's also transient detail, likely to change at any time, and so is outside the scope of Wikipedia which is an encyclopedia not a news source nor even the Platform 5 Locomotives and Coaching Stock. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah right, just noticed the fleet details table on this page is different from the ones on other pages. Maurice Oly (talk) 21:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible for the Production and numbering table under fleet details to be updated now as all 465/2s have now been retired by southeastern.

Source: "'465/2' 'Networkers' Stopped". Rail Express. No. December 2021. p. 28.

I understand that it possibly has very little to do with Production and numbering, however given that Southeastern has retired their 465/2s it’s not correct to say that Southeastern operate the 465/2s in the Production and numbering table. Maurice Oly (talk) 13:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saloon image

Hi all, just wondering how the current image is of "higher quality" when it's horrendously cropped, still features COVID stickers and shows a small portion of the actual interior. I think the previous image was better for users as it showed the actual interior much better rather than the current image.

Kind regards Vanmanyo (talk) 12:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]