Jump to content

Talk:British Rail Class 370/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Merge proposal

There are multiple articles that refer to the APT, it seems to me that ideally they should be merged. AndyLandy (talk) 19:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Against The Class 390 was only part of the Advanced Passenger Train project which began with HSFV1. Chevin (talk) 09:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Against "Advanced Passenger Train" was the name of the overall project - the Class 370 units were the prototype rolling stock constructed to test the technology on a full up basis Hammersfan 16/12/08, 09.42GMT

Against : The APT is nationally notable outside the train industry. The BR Class 370 is barely so, if at all. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Speed record

So did the 225 beat the APT-P or not? The reference claims that the APT-P set the record on a test run, as did the 225 apparently, so why does this article claim the record stands until Eurostar? Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Motor coach no. 49007

Recent edits have added motor no. 49007 - other than ref. 2, I can't find evidence for this. The lists of BR Lot numbers included in

  • Butcher, Roger (November 1993). Departmental Coaching Stock (5th ed.). Southampton: South Coast Transport Publishing. p. 68. ISBN 1-872768-10-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Longworth, Hugh (2013). BR Mark 1 & Mark 2 Coaching Stock. Hersham: Oxford Publishing Co. p. 294. ISBN 978-0-86093-650-3. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

show the motors as six only, numbered 49001-6 - these books do show a seventh DTS and TBF. Similarly,

shows seven DTS and TBF but only six M, numbered 49001-49006. Although there is clear evidence for the seventh DTS+TBF, and that these were used in service in order to provide a short formation - the press runs of the APT used one six-car half-set plus the two-car half-set 370007, with only one motor formed between them: one of the PDF docs ("The shape of travel to come") shows this formation - it's not likely that an extra M would have been needed for similar use. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Dubious source

My virus scanner has picked up on ref [1] ("Advanced Passenger Train – Prototype" at The Crewe Heritage Centre), it's listed under "Harmful websites", apparently "these websites you've visited put your security at risk - creweheritagecentre.org" --Redrose64 (talk) 22:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Crewe is a dangerous place... -mattbuck (Talk) 23:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 370. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on British Rail Class 370. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)