Talk:British Rail Class 210

> Class 210 remained the only non-Mark One design of DEMU until the advent of the Class 220 and Class 221 Voyager units.

What about the 251 "Blue Pullmans"? And the HST which at one point was classed as a DEMU? Pete Fenelon 11:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Capacity

Erm... infobox says that 001 has 4 carriages but capacity 200, while 002 has 3 carriages but capacity 250. Are we sure this is correct? -mattbuck (Talk) 21:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

The "Railway Magazine" August 1982 gives: four car set:- 22 first class and 232 second class seats, total 254, three car set:- 203 second class seats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.68.119 (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possible change to the title of this article

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 210. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070228040609/http://www.nelmes.fsnet.co.uk:80/paxman/paxeng34.htm to http://www.nelmes.fsnet.co.uk/paxman/paxeng34.htm#y3j

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Replica 210

A preservation group is currently fundraising to buy a BR Class 317 to convert into a 210. They have a target of £35,000 for the cost of rebuilding the 210. Should we include it since it is a plan and it looks like it is happening just depends on where they can get the part of the 317 they need to make it an outer suburban version or if it will be an inner suburban version. I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, but at the moment it is trivial. They don't have the money, all we have is a speculative press release based story saying they'd like to do it in the future if they get some money. Let's wait until they have money, have a train, and have a firm plan to convert it. Anyone can put out a press release saying they'd like to do something. Doing it is actually different (and thus possibly notable) 10mmsocket (talk) 21:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

The fact that in one month (see website) they have raised just £190 of the amount needed shows how speculative and thus non-notable this effort is at the moment. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

@10mmsocket It also said on there website they do not need the 317. I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 06:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

References