Talk:British Rail Class 207

Trains: in UK / Passenger trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

Current Operations

A pretty useless section, really. There aren't any current operations; the section is just a very basic summary of what the class did in their last few years in service. A proper operational history would be much more useful. I fully intend to make this, but there are certainly other people better qualified than me to do it. If you're one of them, please sort it out. Alzarian16 (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Rail Class 207. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Design

Folks might notice that these share the cabs nearly the same as the 4VEP's, it was debated and considered to make the 207's to have corridor connections usable at the engineless end but would enable drivers and guards to access all parts of the train without leaving the unit. BR just went ahead with the 4VEP design cab ends but left out the connecting door the 4VEP's had between the forward facing windows. BR at the time realised that if corridor's were to be used, a passageway blocking off from the engine would be required to prevent passengers interfering with the engine's operation. Cab controls like all the SR's corridor connected EMU's could be locked off using the BR1 key and further locked away by the connector doors so people could not climb all over the cab areas. Sadly this left the 207's with a very different cab end arrangement to that of the 205's, the 205's were built on the same suburban standard as the EPB stock whilst the 207 utilised the 4VEP body frame hence why they look a lot different to the 205's. 92.25.22.150 (talk) 02:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]