Talk:British Columbia Civil Liberties Association

Canada: British Columbia / Law Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AoJ.KM.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kempling controversy

Considering the controversial decision by the BCCLA to intervene against Chris Kempling, whose stern treatment by authorities continues to this year, should different wording be used in both the lead and some of the sections. Phrases like they protect fundamental rights and freedoms are only their interpretation. After all, the plain language of the charter defines fundamental freemdoms as including both expression and religion rights, which the BCCLA argued against. I find the statements in the current article stating how the BCCLA champions rights too matter of fact, and ignores the choices the BCCLA had to make in taking sides in certain cases. Deet (talk) 01:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Columbia Civil Liberties Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Major revamp

I am a student at the College of Law of the University of Saskatchewan that has taken this article on as part of a class project. I propose a major overhaul to this article that would include: updating the introduction with current information and citations; a far greater historical background of the organization; and, an overview of its policy positions. Feel free to provide feedback on these suggested changes. AoJ.KM (talk) 04:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have begun adding the historical background of the association, starting with the early 1960s. I have added a brief overview of the activities from the 1970s-present - these activities will be expanded over the coming weeks as I conduct my research. I am also considering creating a separate list page for cases and publications - if anyone has any concerns over any of this, let me know. AoJ.KM (talk) 15:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New list page for cases

As previously proposed, I have moved created a new list of court cases involving the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association that is updated and clears up the main article page AoJ.KM (talk) 01:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now at least C-class and I have changed the rating to reflect that. LexLife (talk) 03:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will be removing the remaining template messages. As to citations, the article has gone from 0 before AoJ.KM started editing it (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Columbia_Civil_Liberties_Association&oldid=752232230) to 37 as of today. It is an unavoidable fact of this subject that most of the references come from the BCCLA's own website or historical documents. Wherever possible, secondary sources have been tracked down and inserted for verification. The message to the effect that the article contains content written like an advertisement should, if still relevant after the edits that have been made, be backed up by a discussion on the article's Talk page. LexLife (talk) 00:28, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]