Talk:British Board of Agrément

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 September 2011. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

No explanation of French used in name of official UK body!

No explanation in this article or on http://www.bbacerts.co.uk/about_us.aspx or even on http://www.bbacerts.co.uk/whats_the_difference_-_jargon.aspx of the French word agrément or why it is used in the name of this official UK body! --Espoo (talk) 17:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page has now been modified and an explanation as to where the term 'Agrément' came from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by British Board of Agrément (talk • contribs) 10:52, 5 September 2011

Article has been included in Wikipedia

The article was deemed worthy for inclusion in Wikipedia: the result of the AfD was to keep it, because it's functional and appropriate as a Wikipedia article per Wikipedia notability guidelines, and its inclusion is congruent with building Wikipedia. Northamerica1000 (talk) 22:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Board of Agrément. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110820043316/http://www.bbacerts.co.uk/default.aspx to http://www.bbacerts.co.uk/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grenfell Fire Disaster

Why is there absolutely no mention of any of the findings around the BBA’s failures and the contribution to the Grenfell Fire Disaster?

https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/bba-committed-very-basic-failure-of-due-diligence-over-kingspan-certificate-inquiry-hears-70095 Fogster74 (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]