Talk:Bristol Bolingbroke

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / British / Canadian / European / North America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:17, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bristol Fairchild Bolingbroke → Bristol Bolingbroke – WP:COMMONNAME. While built by Fairchild-Canada, just "Bristol" appears to be the most common name used in the literature. I have never seen "Bristol Fairchild" in print, and while gHits are tainted by Wikimirrors, gBooks has '"Bristol Fairchild Bolingbroke"' come up with 6 hits (three Wikiclones, two as "Bristol (Fairchild) Bolingbroke", and one unknown), while '"Bristol Bolingbroke" -Shakespeare' has 492 gBooks hits (at least one as "(Fairchild) Bristol Bolingbroke". - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom Bristol Bolingbroke appears to be the more common name in general use. MilborneOne (talk) 16:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments (I'm undecided at the moment): RAF Museum refers to L8756 as "Bristol/Fairchild Bolingbroke"[1]. All 136 Blackburn Roc aircraft were built by Boulton Paul (who also did the detail design work). GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bristol Bolingbroke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bristol Bolingbroke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224043734/http://www.bcam.net/bc-aviation-museum-aircraft.html to http://www.bcam.net/bc-aviation-museum-aircraft.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bolingbroke RAF Cosford

You removed my edit for the Bolingbroke being at the RAF Museum. The sources are already linked up. I saw it at Cosford personally last December. Check all recent YouTube videos. I'm going to put this edit in again as it's correct and it is on display at Cosford. Do not remove my work assuming it's wrong when you haven't been yourself and haven't checked the source evidence which has been updated itself. 2A02:C7E:2899:7900:A4E3:B46C:629D:2298 (talk) 16:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remove your content because I assumed it was wrong, but because it was unsourced. Wikipedia requires reliable published sources be included when new content is added. In addition, personal knowledge alone is not acceptable, as it is Original Research. BilCat (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's ok. As long as you know that the source material had been updated with this new information so it doesn't need to be removed again. 2A02:C7E:2899:7900:5D96:36B:DE26:6BB8 (talk) 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]