Talk:Bristol Berkeley

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Day and Night Bomber

Spec 26/23 was for a single-engined day bombing landplane, it doesnt appear to mention any requirement for night use? MilborneOne (talk) 21:05, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flight in a photo caption 1926-3-11, p.147 has it as a day bomber, though Barnes says night. Two-bay was certainly my error: clearly 3. There comes a point where inner wing struts become centre section struts but I don't (now) think there is any ambiguity here. Barnes skirts round this, saying "the outer wings were originally single bay" (my italics), though he doesn't finish the thought.

Do you know where the & comes from in the Notes, as in Barnes&? Can't seem to clear it.TSRL (talk) 07:28, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted last Q; like Raynham getting out of his spin, I don't quite know how!TSRL (talk) 07:45, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]