Talk:Bristol 411

Bristol Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bristol 411 identification - possible error by me

I have a concern that a picture I uploaded a couple of days ago of a Britsol 411 may have been of an earlier model. That would make it (probably) even more unusual, but it would also mean that the picture appears in the wrong place. And my concern may be misplaced: it might be a Bristol 411 after all. I am not a Bristol expert, but as far as I can make out each individual car could be individually tailored to the customers' requirements, so pigeon holing the things is not always the simple business it is with volume produced cars. Anyhow, on the principal of when in a possible hole, (1) stop digging and (2) ask: Is there, please, an expert reading this, with an opinion to share? Thanks and regards Charles01 14:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

follow up:

someone identified that picture on wiki-commons as being of a Bristol 408. So I put it there.Charles01 (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Paul Lewis Mystery

213.233.159.69 (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC) visitor Last sentence "Contrary to popular belief, Paul Lewis did not in fact, drive a Bristol 411." I don't know who Paul Lewis is and wouldn't say the belief is popular among my social circle. Perhaps this isn't strictly relevant to the article?[reply]

I suspect most readers of the article have never heard of Paul Lewis: I haven't (either). However, wikipedia has several entries on Paul Lewis. Presumably if his Bristol ownership is THAT notable, this Paul Lewis is already one of the ones with a wiki entry. Therefore, please can someone who knows enter a link between the reference to Paul Lewis in the Bristol 411 entry and the correct wiki entry on THAT Paul Lewis?

(Of course, this doesn't answer the question of whether Paul Lewis belongs in an article on the Bristol 411: on the other hand, we don't, between us, seem to have found too much else to write about the car, and maybe till we have done, a little bit of quasi-trivia does not harm. Especially if Paul Lewis is more interesting than, till now, we'd realised...) Charles01 (talk) 14:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bristol 411. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110211074609/http://www.bristolcars.co.uk:80/series6.html to http://www.bristolcars.co.uk/series6.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]