Talk:Brisbane Boys' College/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The lead section should have more of a summary from each section below. The Headmasters section should provide more content than a table. Eg, was there any significant influence, new rules or changes brought by any of them. The number of references is good but they should be formatted better with titles (not just bare urls), publisher and access date. It would be better for the bulleted lists to be converted into prose. The current images are good, although a couple more would be better, photos of the Toowong campus, sports fields and its new buildings for example. If these items were tended to, a few minor readability improvements were made and each section was expanded a little bit more then it would be a good article. I hope that helps as this is my first GA Review.

Reviewer: Shiftchange (talk) 20:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've been looking for your GA checklist template, and the on-hold sign in the GA reviews list, as I was intending to review this. You got here first, but if you need any support don't hesitate to ask.--Kudpung (talk) 23:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per original reviewer, article was placed on hold and not ready for GA. (See my talk page). No modifications have been made since original review. Failing article for now and encouraging renomination once comments have been addressed. Nasty Housecat (talk) 22:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]