Talk:Bridled nail-tail wallaby

Mammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Bridled nail-tail wallaby is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Bridled Nail-tailed Wallaby

There is an article, of sorts, at Bridled Nail-tailed Wallaby. I put a merge-to on it, I did not put the complementary 'merge-from' here. The name does give results on google so I suppose a redirect is appropriate. ☻ Fred|☝ discussion|✍ contributions 19:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added the merge-from. And yes, a redirect is almost always appropriate when completing a merge like this. Too bad it's totally unsourced material. Hard to tell what's good. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I was just trying to be low key. Why did you remove the other names from ~~this~~ the second article? ☻ Fred|☝ discussion|✍ contributions 23:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

There is a bit about dist. and threat here. ☻ Fred|☝ discussion|✍ contributions 23:34, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]