Talk:Bridge above River Ave

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 May 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wrong image?

@RetiredDuke: Ponte do Rio Ave (Q7228162) has an image, which is definitely not a mediaeval bridge. Is there a mistake here? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MSGJ: OK, so. I've been working around a number of Portuguese bridges trying to ascertain notability after a AFD nomination. The thing with this particular article was that it was even more vague than the usual, with no picture, description, coordinates or corresponding Portuguese article (I don't work with Wikidata so I did not see the picture). And then a very generic name on top (meaning bridge above river Ave). So I set out to find a bridge in Vila do Conde above River Ave that satisfied notability concerns. I genuinely thought that D. Zameiro was the one and the article name was a mistake from days long past, but now I see (with the help of Wikidata) that there is indeed a modern bridge named River Ave Bridge. Thing is, I can't find relevant sources for that modern bridge, it's extremely generic. We can probably move the article to River Ave Bridge, revert my changes and redirect to List of bridges in Portugal to keep the history intact. Then I can start a D. Zameiro Bridge article later with the sources I found. Sorry, my mistake. RetiredDuke (talk) 21:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article really made no sense from the get go, it listed the bridge as being in Braga district when Vila do Conde is in Porto district. RetiredDuke (talk) 21:35, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think your suggested approach is the way to go because that Wikidata item is attached to commons:Category:Ponte do Rio Ave (Vila do Conde) which is definitely the modern bridge. It is also using the name Vila do Conde — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:55, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MSGJ: Well, now both the content and article name match the Wikidata item and the article history. I'll try to find more sources for this article in the coming days but I'm not very hopeful. RetiredDuke (talk) 14:37, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]