Talk:Brian Plomley

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Brian Plomley is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Wikify tag

Removed wikifhy tag. It has sufficient wikilinks according to my judgement. Capitalistroadster (talk) 05:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The wikification process includes more than adding wikilinks. Before removing maintenance tags, please familiarize yourself with the issues and process that the tag highlights, then make sure that the issues are properly addressed to improve the article. Thank you. Cindamuse (talk) 06:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(a)You appear to require that this page exemplify standards 95% of wiki articles lack with the ISBNs. (b) It's easy to splash tags everywhere. It is somewhat more intelligent to roll up one's sleeves and chip in to some of that 'wikification' work yourself, if you think it indispensable. By all means do so. Otherwise the temptation to just remove an ugly, if technically correct, scar on the stub, will arise. Otiose pedantry on other people's work is not conducive to collaborative editing. In fact, I've done with this.Nishidani (talk) 06:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went through the article and provided copyediting along with wikification, prior to making the above comment. At this point, the article needs ISBNs. The notation to apply WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is a poor one. Cindamuse (talk) 07:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I.e. 5 minutes supervision, vs. my 5 hours of research and editing. So it would be appreciated, particularly since most of Plomley's bibliographical items lack ISBNs, only 7 from memory (yes, I do check those things), if you could hop in and add them. WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, in context, refers to most of wikipedia, and vulgarity is not an argument, as you note on your page. Nishidani (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brian Plomley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110228212350/http://www.qvmag.tas.gov.au/bloogoocms/uploads/files/publications/records/RecQVM99.pdf to http://www.qvmag.tas.gov.au/bloogoocms/uploads/files/publications/records/RecQVM99.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]