Jump to content

Talk:Brian Frosh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV dispute

[edit]

Article, especially in, "In the Legislature" reads like campaign literature and argues his views. For example, under Privacy and Consumer law it reads, "Privacy and consumer law are two vital issues that will continue to affect the lives of Maryland residents." 76.106.112.121 (talk) 19:46, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article reads like a campaign advertisement. It would not surprise me if it has been written by this politician's supporters. 72.182.4.168 (talk) 14:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I agree, and I am one of this politician's supporters. "Protecting the Public" sounds like it's about Superman. --MopTop (talk) 15:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just trimmed down a bunch of the promotion.Adoring nanny (talk) 04:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed a lot more. I don't know about the "awards" section. I removed some minor awards, but are there still too many? Other than that, I think we could remove the tag. Anyone else?Adoring nanny (talk) 04:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No one else has chimed in. I looked at a bunch of other politician articles. When awards were mentioned, it was things like the Purple Heart or the Presidential Medal of Freedom. By contrast, the Frosh article had a bunch of minor awards, typically without secondary sources. So I removed them all. With that, I think the POV tag can go, too.Adoring nanny (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit on endorsements

[edit]

I've reverted this edit [1] due to multiple problems. First of all, it claims multiple endorsements that are not described in the source. Secondly, it's not encyclopedic. See Barack Obama for example; he had a few endorsements that are mentioned in the article, such as from Hillary Clinton. But he also had tons of endorsements that are not mentioned, simply because they do not rise to the level of what is worth including in an encyclopedia. Lastly, this article has a history of highly-promotional IP edits. This pattern raises WP:COI concerns.Adoring nanny (talk) 04:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]