Talk:Brett Poulos
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled]
[edit]'Students for Concealed Carry on Campus'
This is NOT a dispute over Gun Rights... This is dispute over First Amendment Rights (Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Expression)
The right to carry concealed weapons on campus was part of the protest, but that was never disputed between the University and the said student. The dispute was over the free speech zone and the ban of empty holsters.
Why did you state that? It is quite obvious that this is a 1st Amendment case. The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with the actual dispute. The only time the 2nd Amendment comes into play is when discussing Polous' organization.
WhoaExpletiveDeleted (talk) 14:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Whoa !! Expletive Deleted !