Talk:Breton Ballads/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CommanderWaterford (talk · contribs) 17:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

The only possible "issue" someone could imagine is the Quote of Linda Gowans, in a review for the "Jahrbuch für Volksliedforschung", I guess the quote was in german (was not able to fetch it) (?) per mos:foreignquote. Everything else looks fine.

CommanderWaterford, the first three episodes of Handmaid's Tale dropped, and I gotta say, you have not gotten any better as a human being. Very sad. The quote from Gowans is from the last paragraph of the article (which is in English): "The book has deservedly been awarded The Folklore Society's Katharine Briggs Prize for 1996 - a laurel on which one trusts that Constantine will not long be allowed to rest. She has provided a pioneering guide to an exceptionally perilous forest, and the results of her exploration of new trails will be eagerly awaited." Thanks for the review--I appreciate it! Drmies (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]