Talk:Brecon Beacons

Untitled

The following content has been moved from Talk:Brecon Beacons National Park, following the merger. Blisco 15:18, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Expansion tag added, as this is very short compared with other national park articles. I'm sure we can find more to say SP-KP 18:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Definitely there is more to put. I think perhaps the problem is knowing how to split material between this page (on the national park) and Brecon Beacons itself. Telsa (talk) 11:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Geopark

A recent BBC news story ( 'Amazing' Beacons win top honour (which seems to be about six months late) points to the park authority's page: Fforest Fawr Geopark. There's lots more that could be added, so I leave the URLs in the hope that someone will get around to it before I do :) Telsa (talk) 11:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Proposed merge

Most of the national parks in England and Wales have one article for the NP and the geographical area, so it makes sense to do so here given the paucity of information in both articles. Of course we'd have to make clear that the NP covers a wider area than the Beacons proper. I'd also suggest that once the merger is done, the page is moved to Brecon Beacons; I'm doing it this way round because Brecon Beacons National Park has more information and contains the National Parks template. Blisco 08:25, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

I've taken the lack of comment as indicating silent approval, and carried out the merger. Contrary to what I've said above I've moved content from Brecon Beacons National Park into Brecon Beacons, to simplify title issues. Blisco 15:18, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

In fact it seems to me that there is a case for the splitting of Brecon Beacons (mountain range) from Brecon Beacons National Park since they cover quite different expanses of country. The national park covers so much more than the range which gives the designated area its name, including of course two completely separate mountain ranges in the Black Mountains and the Black Mountain far to the east and west respectively. Comment welcome! Geopersona (talk) 19:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Personally I agree but the original comment was a while ago :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 19:32, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Indeed it was - it surprises me that nobody has revisted the question in nearly 4 years! I'll give it some more thought though and see how 2 separate articles might shape up before doing anything precipitately - there are bound to be counter-arguments made and a discussion would be appropriate. Geopersona (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed divorce

I am recommending that separate pages be established for the mountain range known as Brecon Beacons and for the national park which takes their name. The reason for this is that the former extends over just a small area in southern Powys (a few tens of square kilometres) whilst the latter extends over a much larger area including substantial parts of Carmarthenshire and Monmouthshire, extending to several hundred square kilometres.

The Brecon Beacons National Park is almost alone amongst the British national parks in being named after a small area contained within its boundaries. In the case of the Lake District, Peak District, North York Moors, Yorkshire Dales, Exmoor, Dartmoor, Snowdonia and Pembrokeshire Coast, New Forest and Broads the designated protected area is more or less coincident with the named location. It is not so in the case of either the Cairngorms or the Brecon Beacons where the name of a single mountain range has been used as convenient shorthand for a number of ranges and neighbouring landscapes assembled into a national park.

In the Scottish example, there are separate articles on the mountain range known as the Cairngorms and on the recently established Cairngorms National Park. These articles are not without their own issues but the issues are not those of identity of place.

An article which concentrated simply on the mountains east of the A470 road and west of the Talybont – Pontsticill road and which was perhaps titled Brecon Beacons (range) would cater well to the hills. A separate article titled perhaps Brecon Beacons National Park would do a better job of referring to the wider protected landscape which encompasses that range together with the Black Mountain, Fforest Fawr, Black Mountains and other hills, valleys, moors and settlements between Llandeilo and Abergavenny, between Hay on Wye and Merthyr Tydfil.
Geopersona (talk) 21:14, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

There has been some debate of a similar nature concerning the Grand Canyon and the Grand Canyon National Park - see the latter article's discussion page. Geopersona (talk) 04:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

It's pretty urgent to un-merge Brecon Beacons and Brecon Beacons National Park because, primarily, Brecon Beacons are part of the National Park, not the other way around (as it is presented currently). I'm inclined to be WP:BOLD and copy the relevant sections to the redirect. The one big effect it will have is to remove the two sources from the Brecon Beacons article, leaving it unsourced! Sionk (talk) 23:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Location map

Brecon Beacons

I've uploaded a location map of the Brecon Beacons to Commons (shown to right). I have not created an associated {{location map}} template, but this can easily be done if desired.

If this is created, it will enable creation a map of the Brecon Beacons similar to the one under construction at Talk:Dartmoor#Location map, and could be used in related articles (see this example). Hope people find it useful.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I've added the template: you can use it like this:

Brecon

Abergavenny

class=notpageimage|

Settlements within the Brecon Beacons National Park (green area)

Andreww (talk) 09:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Dangerous mountains?

I have removed a couple of lines which refers to the mountains as being particularly susceptible to changes in weather conditions and their being dangerous in winter. Whilst these views may be asserted by some contributors, the Beacons are no more or less susceptible to changes in the weather than any comparable area so the text is quite un-noteworthy. Nor are they especially dangerous in winter - hazards there are, just as there are weather and terrain-related hazards anywhere for the unwary - again though it is not a noteworthy aspect of the Beacons. cheers Geopersona (talk) 09:02, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Settlements of the Brecon Beacons National Park

I don't find the two sections on 'Towns and villages' of the national park and 'local councils' particularly helpful. Most of the latter are redlinks in any case, at least at present. The former is curiously formatted too. I suggest that they'd be better dealt with in a fashion similar to that on the Dartmoor page where they are contained within an information box at the foot of the page. I may get around to doing that unless arguments against it are suggested. cheers Geopersona (talk) 09:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I have now made a change. Geopersona (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Material removed from article

I removed this inappropriate material (repeated IP details) from the article:
--2.216.86.11 (talk) 16:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)--2.216.86.11 (talk) 16:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)--2.216.86.11 (talk) 16:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Geopersona (talk) 21:40, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Dark-sky_preserve

I notice that the park is listed under Dark-sky_preserve and that this article is also correctly in the Dark-sky_preserve category - but no mention in the article itself ? EdwardLane (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Its International Dark Sky Reserve status is mentioned now. cheers Geopersona (talk) 18:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Image Available

thumb|500px|left|Veil of Snow - Sgwd yr Eira

Pronunciation?

Presumably it's well-known in the UK, but this Yank has no idea how to pronounce "Brecon". BREE-kahn? breh-KOAN? À la française? 209.179.125.65 (talk) 22:02, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Like it has a silent k. Here's some examples: slightly surprised sounding English accent, slight Yorkshire accent (at 1min20ish)

Describing it as having a silent k is perhaps confusing. If you want it in IPA, it's: /ˈbrɛkən/ PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 02:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

What area should this article be about?

More material relating to for example the Black Mountain is creeping into this article whereas there is an article with that name. The problem arises perhaps because Brecon Beacons in the traditional sense extends only across the central range which bears that name ie east of the A470 and west of the Talybont valley. Since 1957 a much larger area has been designated as the Brecon Beacons National Park and since then the term 'Brecon Beacons' has been rather more widely applied, particularly by visitors, to the combination of the (traditional) Brecon Beacons, Y Mynydd Du/The Black Mountain, Fforest Fawr and the Black Mountains. It is often used as shorthand for Brecon Beacons National Park - for which there is that separate article. For myself, I'd restrict descriptions in this article to the smaller, traditional area and not to the wider area. Others will no doubt differ and make comment! cheers Geopersona (talk) 06:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Name Change

Please see Talk:Brecon Beacons National Park#Welsh as the official name for ongoing discussion about the name. Please do not change the name to Bannau Brycheiniog without discussion and a consensus. Brecon Beacons remains the WP:COMMONNAME. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

The heading needs changing to Bannau Brycheinog. There has been no 'name change', simply a reversion of name from English to Welsh.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:183:4601:3480:5921:84fc:5f34:368b (talk • contribs)

Not done. Please see Talk:Brecon Beacons National Park#Welsh as the official name. Wikipedia uses the common name, and will change the title as and when the common name becomes this new name. See WP:COMMONNAME Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Typical biased Wikipedia mod reply.

What do you struggle to understand about there NOT being a new name? The common name is the Welsh name, which is the original name - not a 'new name', that is what should be used. 2601:183:4601:3480:5921:84FC:5F34:368B (talk) 20:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Provide evidence the common name is the Welsh name. This is English Wikipedia, what it was known in Welsh for decades applies to Welsh Wikipedia, with Brecon Beacons being the name the park used in English until April. Common usage in favour of the introduced Welsh name into English will take time to change in independent media, Wikipedia does not apply official names nor "original" names, if they're not the common name (yet). There may be a noticeable change in favour of Bannau Brycheiniog over the next few months/years, when that happens Wikipedia will follow suit. DankJae 20:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected

Article is briefly semi-protected to prevent an edit-war over pre-eminence for the English or Welsh name. Hoping editors with a view on this topic can discuss here on the talkpage, including appropriate reliable sources. Apologies to any IP editors looking to make unrelated edits: please consider using the edit request function or waiting till the protection expires. -- Euryalus (talk) 09:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Mountain range

Is "Brecon Beacons" no longer a mountain range? Has this been replaced by "Central Beacons" or "Fforest Fawr"? I re-added it to the lead as I believe the recent name change/merge did not change the mountain range which was in the lead before, but since removed again. Plus this article is kinda about three things now, the "mountain range" (which may be called differently), the national park and this "mountainous region" which I believe is wholly based on the national park. DankJae 19:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Since the designation of the Brecon Beacons National Park in 1957 and the corresponding increase in the use of the term 'Brecon Beacons' to loosely refer to both the whole designated area and indeed parts of it, many have felt an increasing need to be able to distinguish the central group of mountains from the rest and so the 'central Beacons' has seen increased use. That central group retains its traditional name of the Brecon Beacons (or indeed Bannau Brycheiniog in Welsh), noting that individual mountains and groups of mountains have enjoyed other names as well over the centuries. Fforest Fawr (in the traditional sense rather than the Geopark sense) was a description of an area established by the conquering Normans as a hunting area and as such has an irregular boundary which takes in part of the Black Mountain/Y Mynydd Du (as far west as the county boundary) and some westernmost parts of the 'central Beacons' though its core is the upland area broadly between the A4067 and the A470. Not unusually, the exact boundary has varied over the centuries. These observations of mine are taken from maps in authoritative books on the 'Great Forest' (RCAHMW, 1990 and Prof W Rees, 1966) - I've not yet seen these maps available on the web anywhere. From what I can see, modern (largely recreational) use of the name tends to restrict the area referred to as 'Fforest Fawr' as being between those roads. Overall, outside of Wikipedia as well as inside, it's a messy situation and this article and other related ones ought probably to reflect that; there are/have been, at the same time, various naming authorities and none! Geopersona (talk) 07:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes I’m aware the term has broadened, while there is a need for a specific term for the original range. But has Brecon Beacons fallen out of use for the original range enough for it to no longer be used clearly for it? Prior to the merge this article was clearly described as a mountain range. But what has changed that it is no longer one? Like if the range is no longer referred to here as clearly, then where? Should there be a “Central Beacons” article? DankJae 12:24, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I wouldn't necessarily anticipate consensus on this question. OS appear to continue to label the central Beacons massif as 'Brecon Beacons/Bannau Brycheiniog' but why, on the 50K map, they choose different styles for that name (bunched up & off-centre), for Fforest Fawr (horizontal and spaced out) and for 'Black Mountain / Y Mynydd Du' (curving and spaced out), I do not know. Geopersona (talk) 18:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm just asking whether there is justification that we can no longer refer to "Brecon Beacons" as a mountain range or use that term for the same range. @A.D.Hope, this applies to your edit. This article was "mountain range" for years, should there be more clarity or has it ceased to be a mountain range? DankJae 10:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

There needs to be clarity inasmuch as the range shares its name with the park, but so far as I can tell the range is still frequently called the Brecon Beacons:

• National Park Authority
• Visit Wales: "Defining the park are the highest mountains in southern Britain – the Bannau Brycheiniog (Brecon Beacons) – and the three ranges surrounding them, the Black Mountain Range, Fforest Fawr and Black Mountains."
• National Trust
• Britannia

It's worth noting that the National Trust passage includes "From Fan y Big looking west towards the Beacons", implying that only Pen-y-Fan, Corn Du, and Cribyn are "the Beacons", and Britannica still uses "Brecknock" in parentheses.

To directly answer you, yes, the Brecon Beacons is a mountain range. Whether "Bannau Brycheiniog" is exactly synonymous with "Brecon Beacons" when referring to the range, I'm still not sure. A.D.Hope (talk) 11:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

I suspect the ONS may use that format to indicate a prominent but compact massif — compare Brecon Beacons/Bannau Brycheiniog to Snowdon/Yr Wyddfa or the Old Man of Coniston on the one hand, and Whernside or the Clwydian Range on the other. I'd take that to mean they only consider Pen y Fan and its immediate neighbours to be the Brecon Beacons. A.D.Hope (talk) 13:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Only just saw the continuing thread . . . yes, the Brecon Beacons is still an individual mountain range, but it's also commonly referred to as the central Beacons and also referred to as (Y) Bannau Brycheiniog by Welsh speakers. And yes, English and Welsh speakers use the same terms to refer - perhaps more informally - to the whole extent of the National Park and to the collection of individual massifs within it (plus that small bit of the Black Mountains which extend into Herefordshire). Some historic references suggest that the term 'Beacons' was once used to refer only to Pen y Fan and Corn Du, with the inclusion sometimes of a third peak but usage of toponymic terms changes over time and the dates and character of the changes can often be tricky to pin down, there being variability in usage from person to person at any one time. These observations are based in part on my many conversations with residents of, and visitors to the area over many years. Geopersona (talk) 11:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Subdivided area map

It would be helpful to have a map which showed the region's four areas, wouldn't it? Something like the Fforest Fawr Geopark image to the right, although blurred rather than hard boundaries might be better. Am I right in saying that the area boundaries are approximately:

• Black Mountain: everything within the park boundary west of the Tawe/A4067
• Fforest Fawe: everything between the A4067 and Taf Fawr/A470
• Brecon Beacons: everything between the Taf Fawr/A470 and Usk/A40
• Black Mountains: everything east of the Usk/A40, including the Olchon Valley outside the park boundary in Herefordshire

One thing I can't quite work out is whether the range south of the Central Beacons (Cefn yr Ystrad, Mynydd Llangatwg, etc) and the spur of the park toward Cwmbran are considered part of the Central Beacons or not. A.D.Hope (talk) 08:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I completely missed the above discussion when I was typing this out — @Geopersona and @DankJae, I'm sure you have thoughts and probably know the areas better than me! A.D.Hope (talk) 16:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

What you outline @A.D.Hope, is broadly true though I suspect many would associate Cefn Cul with Fforest Fawr rather than Y Mynydd Du/The Black Mountain and might not include Skirrid and Sugar Loaf within the Black Mountains for example. The question of those upland areas in the southeast i.e. Cefn yr Ystrad eastward, is different - they are not readily associated with any of the foregoing but rather with the coalfield uplands to the south though are partly separated from them by the lower ground of the 'Heads of the Valleys corridor'. I'd think most people would view the minor road between Talybont and Pontsticill as the southeast limit of the 'central Beacons' and a southerly limit vaguely around the present day county boundary between the two Taf Valleys. I don't know what sources may have to say on the subject, if anything. Rather than blurred boundaries, just placing the relevant text centrally on the areas concerned might work best. cheers Geopersona (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm quite happy to follow your lead on which exact peaks are within which area, and you seem to have access to the sources we'll eventually need. On central text or blurred boundaries, I think marking the areas boundaries as well we can as we can would be helpful to make it clear that some of them overlap (e.g. Fforest Fawr and the Black Mountain) and that the Black Mountains extend into England rather than stopping at the border. A.D.Hope (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I don't know too much about the area tbh, just the names they've used and what for. Happy to help with any map, although can sources be provided for such boundaries? DankJae 10:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Good sources can be provided for the historical area of Fforest Fawr and for the extent of the modern Geopark of the same name. I cannot immediately bring to mind precise definitions of any of the other labels in any references, perhaps partly because these sorts of things are typically ill-defined and vary from one user to another. I'll take a further look though.Geopersona (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Bannau Brycheiniog name update

Just an update on the use of Bannau Brycheiniog: those following Welsh news may have noticed like I have that the term Bannau Brycheiniog now seems to be used by the vast majority of published sources, particularly in recent months.

See some of these recent examples:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/travel/places-to-travel-destinations-2024.html (in headline)

https://www.brecon-radnor.co.uk/news/bannau-brycheiniog-national-park-launches-gold-ambassador-award-657810 (in headline)

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/lifestyle/tv/bbc-one-show-welsh-ex-28418282 (body of text)

https://www.westerntelegraph.co.uk/news/24045749.bannau-brycheiniog-among-new-york-times-must-go-places-2024/ (in headline)

https://nation.cymru/culture/bannau-brycheiniog-listed-one-of-the-best-places-in-the-world-to-visit-in-2024/ (in headline)

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/whats-on/travel/bannau-brycheiniog-named-new-york-28422186 (in headline)

https://www.itv.com/news/wales/2023-10-30/how-sheep-wool-blankets-are-being-used-to-tackle-climate-change

Surprisingly, even GB News has used it (they have breached ofcom standards multiple times so the source may not be reliable): https://www.gbnews.com/travel/staycation-places-to-visit-2024-manchester-wales Titus Gold (talk) 23:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Still a small selection of sources as stated at your section at Talk:Brecon Beacons National Park#Bannau Brycheiniog name, where I raise some sources still using Brecon Beacons, but definitely progress. Although a lot reference the NYT, rather than their own general use, do the publications generally use the Welsh name on generalised articles. Plus this article is also on the mountainous region and range so sources describing those under the Welsh name are also needed not just the national park. If the national park article were separate then probably a stronger case. DankJae 23:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes, this just a selection to demonstrate the seeming shift. Is now a good time just to compare the number of published sources for each name? Titus Gold (talk) 19:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

See also: my other discussion here
<> Even https://www.breconbeacons.org/ and https://www.visitwales.com/attraction/country-park/brecon-beacons-national-park-1444213 still uses the current name although https://bannau.wales/ . And see https://news.sky.com/story/rishi-sunak-will-not-use-welsh-name-for-brecon-beacons-12868494 because the government "claims [that] 'most people' will continue to use the English version".

Basically, I do not think many people will use Bannau Brycheiniog, let alone speak it because 1) it is hard to pronounce and 2) to spell. Plus, many people are used to the old name so I have yet to see Türkiye in spoken and informal texts although I am not sure about if many people to this day still use Kiev in informal texts given that most reliable sources no longer use it. It seems more likely Snowdon to change its name to Yr Wydffa than this rename it feels like. But it does not feel the same way that Uluru was formerly known as Ayers Rock. Besides, I am not sure if using the official website counts as a secondary source

(side note:) and also, did I remember that there used to be an article on the national park before it got merged into this section. Breathinkeeps32 (talk) 23:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

@Breathinkeeps32, We don't speculate what should/shouldn't be used, but what is used, nor basing on the average reader's difficulty with names. If a majority of sources do at some point then it should be moved, and notably they would be in text so pronouncing it isn't important, while there are many more difficult place-names IMO to spell in Wales alone. Per WP:NAMECHANGES we follow what a majority of sources use not what the average reader likely uses per WP:COMMONNAME. Some sources have definitely switched, but no comparative evidence has been made that it is a "majority".

The official website is not "independent" so doesn't meet WP:NAMECHANGES so not used as well as the general "official name" argument. Turkey" is still used by sources, while "Kiev" and "Ayers Rock" not as much.

Yes the NP was merged here, there could be a case for a split should either this article be expanded or possibly if in a move discussion, debates are held whether the new name is only for the NP but hasn't been as used for the mountain range. DankJae 00:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Infobox

I've just switched the infobox over to template:infobox mountain, incorporating the previous national park infobox as a module. I think this allows for more nuance, particularly over names (e.g. if we decide that the national park is now exclusively 'Bannau Brycheiniog' but the range isn't) and the disinction between the beacons range and the national park.

On the latter, should the 'mountain' part of the infobox now cover just the Brecon Beacons range (i.e. Pen y Fan and friends), or all four of the ranges which make up the national park? I can see the argument for either, although for the sake of being BOLD and seeing how it works I've focussed it on the Brecon Beacons range for now. A.D.Hope (talk) 13:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

When I raised the discussion above I did comment when you converted this article from Mountain range to Mountainous region, what that means. But you edited the article stating that this article is now on the region, then all ranges should be there. I believe in the long term, the range should be split off. DankJae 13:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

It would be easier to split the national park article back off, if that's what you're minded to do. A.D.Hope (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

We'd end up with five articles – one each on the ranges, and one for the national park. There'd be some work involved to make sure this article didn't include things which don't relate to the Brecon Beacons/Central Beacons, but it's doable. A.D.Hope (talk) 14:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

@A.D.Hope, however I believe this "Mountainous region" is purely because of the national park. Plus if the NP were split off, then it could be under Bannau Brycheiniog. DankJae 14:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

I think the best thing would be to separate the split from the name issue. Move the national park material back to Brecon Beacons National Park, which is where it came from in the first place, then have a separate discussion about moving it to Bannau Brycheiniog National Park. A.D.Hope (talk) 14:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Still if the two are separate, then BBNP will likely move first at some point. Just stating the possibility. Nonetheless, prefer if these were done through split proposals. DankJae 14:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

I've opened a split discussion below. A.D.Hope (talk) 22:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Splitting back into range and national park

Note: This discussion is about content, not the article name. If the decision to split is made, a separate discussion will be opened on whether to use "Brecon Beacons National Park" or "Bannau Brycheiniog National Park" as the article title.

I propose undoing my WP:BOLD merge of Brecon Beacons National Park into this page on 9 June 2023. While there is some overlap in content, as the national park covers a much wider area than the Brecon Beacons mountain range it will be easier and clearer to cover the two separately. A.D.Hope (talk) 22:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

• Comment – I'll wait and see any other responses. I assume the split offs will resemble the versions of the articles prior to the merge, [1][2] including the bolding in their leads, although the odd bit could switch between the two.

Yes, the name should follow the April RM, although a separate article is more likely to succeed in a move than this article on the range which wasn't directly subject to the rename. DankJae 23:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

@A.D.Hope, also as said above, I believe the "region" is conterminous with the national park, this article should be on the mountain range (singular). DankJae 23:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Yep, 'range' would be the word to use if the split happens. This article would be about Pen y Fan and friends, not the wider region. A.D.Hope (talk) 23:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

@A.D.Hope, mind re-wording the heading? DankJae 23:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Ah! Done :) A.D.Hope (talk) 23:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

• Support (why wait), they're not the same subject (one range, the other a wider general area), and confusing together. DankJae 23:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

  @Geopersona, @Sionk, you two supported the split when it was previously merged again. Do you hold the same opinion? following again a bold merge. Or has the situation changed to keep them together? DankJae 21:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

• Support on the basis the two cover significantly different areas. I re-split the articles back in 2015 so would be delighted for this to happen. Sionk (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
• Support I think the split is sensible in this case. Although readers might initially be confused to find two similarly named articles, the articles themselves would then be educational in explaining why this is so. As long as copy-pastes between the articles are minimised, and that the articles are complimentary and not overly repetitive, this would be the better arrangement. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
• Support I would still go for that option, yes. thanks Geopersona (talk) 19:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
• Support They're different (though related) subjects. Llwyld (talk) 21:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
• As the discussion has been open for a month and has unanimous support, I've performed the split. There's still work to be done to each article, but I think I've rearranged all the material to the most logical location. A.D.Hope (talk) 09:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. But shouldn't the lengthy section about the official name change be deleted from the Brecon Beacons article? It was the official name change for the National Park. Sionk (talk) 13:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

I've removed it myself. Sionk (talk) 13:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Yeah best at the NP. DankJae 14:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm sure there's plenty of tinkering to be done, but now the pages are actually split that should be a fair bit easier. A.D.Hope (talk) 14:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)