Greetings! I know you've waited a few months for a review, but I have good news! I'm stuck in a tin can for 5 hours tomorrow late night UTC, so I'm going to use that time wisely to review this article. I expect to have the review posted in the early morning hours UTC the following day. (Approximately less than 36 hours from this post.) I look forward to reading and reviewing this article. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Probably" see WP:ALLEGED. Either need a different word, or remove the word, or find a source that claims probably.
The Athill book which is used as a citation says it is "extremely likely". I don't think a definitive answer will ever be given so probably reflects the source unless you have a better word.— Rodtalk08:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would end the sentence at "...mid-4th century." and start the next sentence: "According to at least one source, it is extremely likely this temple succeeded..." and make sure that source stays at the end. TLSuda (talk) 04:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do we know what the results of the proposals to construct a Severn Barrage are? I assume they are obviously not successful, but do we know?
See Severn Barrage. The proposals which go back over 100 years have never been successful so far, however Peter Hain and others are still working on further proposals and trying to persuade the government to fund either the barrage or tidal lagoons. (As an aside and this is personal speculation - the development of Hinkley Point C nuclear power station will mean that a lot of the infrastructure will be put in place making future development of a barrage more likely). I'm not sure how to word it - perhaps say that previous proposals have been unsuccessful but future developments are awaited or similar.— Rodtalk08:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think you word it exactly how you just worded it to me: "The proposals which go back over 100 years have never been successful so far, however Peter Hain and others are still working on further proposals and trying to persuade the government to fund either the barrage or tidal lagoons." Thats really good writing there. This is why I like to ask open ended questions: you do the work in your response. TLSuda (talk) 04:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all your comments. I have addressed most but see comment re barrage proposals above and the use of "probably" for 4th century building.— Rodtalk08:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
