Jump to content

Talk:Breaking Point (Keri Hilson song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Till I Go Home (talk · contribs) 11:50, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will review the article to have the backlog going. 3 months is a long time to wait for a review. Thanks. Till I Go Home talk edits 11:50, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

[edit]
  • No disambiguation links.
  • It was written by --> Change it to "the song" etc. because of repetition.  Done
  • The background section should be retitled to "development and inspiration" or something along that line. 'Background' is a broad term.  Done
  • Hilson explained that she wrote the song about women's experiences --> Hilson explained that inspiration for writing the song came from women's experiences  Done
  • The song shares its theme with "The Way You Love Me" as the they are both about "women coming to terms with what they need from a relationship". --> Uhh what? The they?  Done
  • Hilson premiered "Breaking Point" --> "Breaking Point" premiered on...  Done
  • Link girl-group  Done
  • Link music critics  Done
  • Concepcion likened it lyrical wise --> awkward prose  Done
  • link En Vogue  Done
  • One too many "it"s in the chart performance sub-section.  Done
  • The video begins as she lounges in her bed --> awkward  Done
  • Ref. 34 --> publisher is also Google.  Done
  • Perhaps you could add an image to the article?  Done
  • Has she performed it live?
    Yes, but only minor concerts that reliable sources don't cover. Pancake (talk) 13:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    There aren't really any major issues in the article.
All issues have been addressed. I'm passing the article — Till I Go Home talk edits 13:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]