Talk:Break room

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Break room appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 August 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, a United States regulatory agency, does not require workplaces to have employee break rooms?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Break room.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 10:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Employee break room in the United States

... that the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not require workplaces to have employee break rooms?

Source: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1976-06-22

ALT1: ... that Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards do not require workplaces to have a break room or lunch room for their employees? Source: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1976-06-22
Reviewed:

Created by Bohemian Baltimore (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 10:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article was nominated on day of creation. It is fleshed out with neutral coverage and reliable sources formatted with inline citations. Earwig shows no copyright violations, with the only results being quotations that are followed up by references in the prose. The hook is very informative and frankly important to share. ALT0 breaks the tiebreaker for me as it is more concise but not leaving out important information. Hook claim is backed by a reliable, primary source in the prose. Image is suitable for use in this nomination. No QPQ requirement needed here. Good to go! Aria1561 (talk) 23:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]