Talk:Brazilian monitor Alagoas/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 08:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Was the Alagoas' commander commended/reprimanded for the dash past the Paraguyan guns?

   Not that I know about. I suspect that his success offset his disobedience.

   What role did she play in the Fleet Revolt?

   She bombarded the gov't forts.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Two questions relating to her Service history, and then this can be passed. Skinny87 (talk) 08:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)