Jump to content

Talk:Branson Air Express

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suggest for Deletion

[edit]

THIS IS NOT AN AIRLINE

Made a new section could be created for NON Airlines.

This non airline that uses the business services of other airlines is such a NON airline that it will not even have flights on other airlines for a set period of time according to this article. Really is weak to be given an airline box.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.183.114.53 (talk • contribs)

That's your opinion, and I disagree with it. Branson Air Express is a marketing carrier like Delta Connection or United Express. It doesn't matter that they're not an operating carrier. -Drdisque (talk) 17:21, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well don't call it an airline.... call it a marketing carrier... I really do not think Delta Connection or Branson Air Express is worthy of an airline box —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.176.254.58 (talk) 22:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


With all due respect, Drdisque, Branson Air Express cannot legally be called an airline unless it has an operating certificate. Those are DOT & FAA rules. There is a big difference between a marketing alliance such as Delta/Delta Connection or United/United Express and Branson Air Express. BAE is a tour operator ... a wholesaler. That is not an airline, whereas the Express partners (SkyWest, ASA, ExpressJet, Mesa, etc.) are full Part 121 carriers. Vision has a Part 121 certificate; CFM has a non-sked certificate. If you doubt my points, check out the DOT's six-figure fine of Morris Air from the early 90s when it was still using Sierra Pacific and Ryan Int'l crews and aircraft while Morris was still obtaining its own operating certificate and doing business as a tour operator, not an air carrier. KN prematurely called itself an airline and the DOT was not happy.Writerross (talk) 04:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not the DOT. However, I've taken your input into account and changed some wording. However, I advise not to get hung up over what Part airlines are certificated under. Firstly, this is only relevant in the US while wikipedia is worldwide. Secondly, the DOT only requires that you have a Part 135 certification to call yourself an airline - an example is SeaPort Airlines. Corporate Flight Management is Part 135 certificated. -Drdisque (talk) 14:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Branson Air Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Branson_Air_Express&oldid=1200327686"