Jump to content

Talk:Brandon Wade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Defamation Concerns

[edit]

Regarding this edit;

Would the IP making the edit please try to point to the exact sentences where defamatory material appears? We will do our best to try to help correct any issues that exist. NickCT (talk) 16:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brandon Wade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed edit

[edit]

This edit reverted the just prior edit which contained a report of an arrest that appears to be public record.

The format of the introduction of the material found on Highbeam is incorrect and the summary deviates from the source in ways that may be viewed as negative towards the subject. Whether it could be considered libel is questionable. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 21:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This material needs to be explicitly sourced to this individual for inclusion - not just a name with a background that seems a bit off. Kuru (talk) 23:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]