Talk:Brand X (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 17:39, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Lead

"critcs" >> "critics"
"the witness dies mysteriously who was due to testify against the Morley cigarette company" >> "the witness who was due to testify against the Morley cigarette company dies mysteriously"
"soon discover is that a new brand" >> "soon discover that a new brand"
"The scenes featuring the insects took up to a full day to film." >> "Those scenes took up to a full day to film."

Plot

"the life of one Dr. James Scobie" >> "the life of Dr. James Scobie"
"floor, his face ripped" >> "floor, with his face ripped"
delinked "thoracic surgery".
delinked "nicotine"

Writing

Reduced the image to 190px.
Okay

Filming

Okay

Broadcast and reception >> Reception

11th Hour Magazine >> 11th Hour Magazine
"the episode's loss in direction" >> "the its loss in direction"

References

Okay

Well, i finished my review and made some minor changes. Since nothing is left to be done, i'm passing the article. —Hahc 21 00:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

—Hahc 21 00:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]