Talk:Brahmajāla Sūtra

Buddhism Mid‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tibet Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

I've moved this from the spurious Pali title, which is absurd for a Mahayana text. Peter jackson (talk) 11:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it should actually be under the Chinese title. Peter jackson (talk) 12:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to maintain the Sanskrit title as-is, but add Chinese and Japanese titles as well, for reference. This is similar to how other articles are done, allowing for consistency. Thanks! --Ph0kin (talk) 10:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about the fact that many/most/all scholars regard the Sanskrit title as spurious & this as being a Chinese work (or maybe Central Asian? Doesn't seem to be mentioned. Peter jackson (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]