Talk:Bradshaw's Guide

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Trains: in UK / Passenger trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	February 28, 2015

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

This article lacks references.

Travel and Tourism

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge from George Bradshaw#Bradshaw's railway guides into Bradshaw's Guide

I don't really have the patience to do it on my own, but I think that the text at the George Bradshaw article should be moved to this one, leaving a lengthy summary in the original location. Any concerns, please say so, or else be bold and move the text. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 16:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

rule of thumb for you

the Bradshaw page is SIX screens, the Guide page is FIVE screens -- once a discreet topic reaches such a size they should NOT be combined; okay, Shakespeare has to be gigantic, but not everybody using Wikipedia has bandwidth or RAM to accomodate large-size pages on lesser topics (for my own website content, I break up pages that reach 100KB of HTML code) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6001:6:3592:5B65:8C7D:E3ED (talk) 20:51, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.

I suggest we move about four screens from the George Bradshaw page to the Guide page. Then I think the Guide page should then be split up into articles about the different editions.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 21:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and

Done. Note that the final target page size is only 27kB even with all text moved, so size isn't a problem. Klbrain (talk) 11:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1913

Is there any 1913 version? . I saw a TV Railway series based on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.175.41.227 (talk) 10:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Highly likely. There were several editions every year. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Links

I suggest adding the following

Alekksandr (talk) 21:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conspicuous absence

Mention of Michael Portillo. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 14:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]